OilerBuck
Sweet Crude
Id personally like to use our final 8 schollies on players other than Russell and Robiskie. Nothing personal against them, it's all in the numbers and needs.slobberknocker said:hey oiler what if russell picks us over duke?
do we let robiskie go ?
Russell would be more of an option if Wells goes elsewhere...we don't need to reach on him if Wells comes here. I definately don't want him as a safety as we are stacked at that position and I see him as a project who is a run stuffer and a coverage liability.
I don't take Robiskie unless we have a couple extra schollies lying around on NLI day.
Two players of this quality? Different positions...take both. Maybe replace Rowell on my chart with Ashley. Rowell seems impressed with West Virginia. While DT is not a huge need, anytime you can pick up a player or Walkers quality (and screw Petey in the process) you do it. I am very skeptical of this, however and believe he is a heavy USC lean.slobberknocker said:with bsb's post last nite we lead for walker ashley do you take him or wilson
With Dionte at FB, we can definately afford to pass on this, but it seems to make sense to me. I like fast fullbacks that can lead to the outside and have experience running the ball. Alex probably isn't the devistating blocker that Johnson is right now and a redshirt year to separate the two could be key. A Daniels get could also relieve some of our necessity of getting two top flite RB's if he can run in a pinch, opening the door to get a big name next year.slobberknocker said:I do agree with daniels at fullback 6-2 220 and runs like a 4.6
I'm not nearly as good at this as 86 or Nutty, but those are my opinions on the situation.
Upvote
0