• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Your housing market overvalued?

I became a home owner in Taos about a year ago. Paid over offer on a 1250 sq ft. 2 bedroom, 2 bath, Pueblo/Santa Fe adobe.
Value went up $50000 in 6 weeks! But I do have what everyone wants. And my view of Taos Mountain and the Sangre De Cristos is amazing.
My house didn't even hit the "market" before there was a bidding war. You see a house in the newspaper and it's sold already.
Still a hot market here with much building going on.
 
Upvote 0
By JAMES R. HAGERTY
March 11, 2006; Page A1
Millions of Americans who stretched themselves financially to buy homes face a painful adjustment -- some could even lose their houses -- as monthly payments on adjustable-rate mortgages are reset higher.
In the hot housing market of recent years, many households took advantage of "affordability" mortgage loans -- heavily promoted by lenders -- that hold down payments for an initial period. Now the initial periods are coming to an end on many of these loans, leaving borrowers to face resets of their interest rates that can cause monthly payments to shoot up between 10% and 50%.
More than $2 trillion of U.S. mortgage debt, or about a quarter of all mortgage loans outstanding, comes up for interest-rate resets in 2006 and 2007, estimates Moody's Economy.com, a research firm in West Chester, Pa.
Most borrowers will be able to cope with the coming wave of resets, in some cases by refinancing with new loans, lenders and mortgage industry analysts say. But some borrowers will have trouble meeting the higher payments and may be forced to sell their homes or could lose their homes to foreclosures. A recent study by First American Real Estate Solutions, a unit of title insurer First American Corp., projects that about one in eight households with adjustable-rate mortgages that originated in 2004 and 2005 will default on those loans.
Resets will "eat into discretionary spending" for many Americans, says Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist at MFR Inc., an economic consulting firm in New York. He expects consumer spending to slow in the months ahead but says the job market remains strong enough to keep most people out of serious trouble.
Still, a barrage of negative trends is making things tougher for already-strained borrowers. Interest rates are rising, which can increase the size of each mortgage reset and make refinancing more expensive. The housing market is cooling, making it harder to sell homes or build up a cushion of home equity.
Regulators are pressing lenders to tighten their lending standards, which probably will make it more difficult for some people to qualify for refinancing. And some credit-card companies have recently started requiring higher minimum payments. Energy costs are up sharply, too, as are property taxes.


One couple that faces a reset this summer is Ruth and Magdi Fadlalla, who two years ago bought a three-bedroom house for about $294,000 in the New York borough of Queens. Their loan carries an interest rate of 7.46% for the first two years. This summer, at the first reset, the rate will jump to 9.46%, they have been advised, and the rate could rise further in the future unless interest rates generally decline. Already, the Fadlallas have fallen behind on their monthly payments of about $1,950 and have been put on notice that their home could soon be lost to foreclosure.
'This Is Killing Me'
Mrs. Fadlalla, a special-education teacher, says her property taxes have risen sharply and other costs of home ownership proved higher than she expected. "This is killing me," Mrs. Fadlalla says, though she adds that "I'm going to work it out."
She is working with two local nonprofit groups, Neighborhood Housing Services of New York and Jamaica Housing Improvement, to try to avert foreclosure. "They never could afford this loan," says Peggy Morris, executive director of Jamaica Housing Improvement, who blames lenders for failing to take more care in warning borrowers of risks.
The Fadlallas got their loan through a branch of Southern Star Mortgage Corp., East Meadow, N.Y., acting as a broker. Like most mortgages, the loan later was sold to a financial firm that put it into a pool of loans that back mortgage securities owned by a variety of investors. Gary Shusterhoff, president of Southern Star, says the Fadlallas qualified for the loan when they applied.
A unit of Wells Fargo & Co., acting as a trustee for the investors that now own the loan, has initiated legal action to collect overdue payments. A Wells Fargo spokeswoman confirmed the action but had no further comment.
Debt counselors are bracing for many more such cases. "We have just begun to see what I fear is going to be quite a flood" of people seeking help in coping with resets, says Sarah Gerecke, chief executive of Neighborhood Housing Services.
Christopher L. Cagan, director of research and analytics at First American Real Estate Solutions, Santa Ana, Calif., plays down the threat to the economy as a whole from resets. He figures most borrowers who bought their homes or most recently refinanced before 2004 are in good shape. That's because the surge of home prices in most parts of the country lifted the values of their houses well above the amounts due on loans.
The bigger risk is with people who bought homes more recently and haven't yet benefited from lots of price appreciation -- and, in some cases, won't necessarily benefit at all because their local markets are cooling. For a study released in February, Dr. Cagan examined adjustable-rate first mortgage loans made in 2004 and 2005, including refinancings. He figures about 7.7 million of these loans are outstanding, representing $1.888 trillion of debt.
About 1.4 million of those households face a jump of 50% or more in their monthly payments once their initial low-payment periods run out, Dr. Cagan says, and an additional 1.6 million face smaller increases that are still likely to strain their finances.
Assuming that home prices stay around current levels and interest rates don't rise sharply, Dr. Cagan figures about one million households eventually will default and lose their homes to foreclosure. That would cause about $110 billion of losses for lenders, he says.
Lenders and the economy as a whole could easily cope with such losses, Dr. Cagan says, though it would be devastating for some families and painful for some investors who bought securities backed by the riskiest loans. "It won't happen all at once," Dr. Cagan says. "It will be spread out over several years."
Such wild cards as interest rates and home prices could throw off the projection. If interest rates shoot upward and home prices fall, the number of foreclosures could be much higher than Dr. Cagan's scenario foresees. If interest rates decline and home prices surge, the damage would be less.
Assuming economic growth remains healthy, foreclosures are likely to increase only "modestly" from the current pace, says Doug Duncan, chief economist at the Mortgage Bankers Association. He says job losses -- not resets -- are the biggest cause of foreclosures.
Subprime borrowers, those with weak credit records, are most at risk. In the past few years, many subprime borrowers held down their initial costs by using so-called 2/28 loans, whose rates are fixed at a relatively attractive rate for the first two years.
A typical subprime borrower who took out a 2/28 mortgage in 2004 has been paying interest of 7.1% for the first two years, says Grant Bailey, a director at Fitch Ratings in New York. Once that introductory period ends, the interest rate is reset every six months for the remaining 28 years of the loan at a margin over interbank rates, the rates banks charge one another for short-term money.
The 2/28 loans generally limit the size of the first jump in rates to around three percentage points. That would bring the monthly rate to 10.1%. Monthly payments for a borrower with a loan of about $150,000 would rise to about $1,315 from $1,000. Assuming interest rates stay around current levels, the rate would jump again to about 11% within six months to a year, bringing the monthly payment to $1,400, or 40% higher than the initial payment. Borrowers who chose loans that allow them to pay only the interest for an initial period, deferring principal payments, face even bigger increases -- more than 50% in some cases.
Choosing to Refinance
Rather than face those big jumps, many borrowers will refinance into new 2/28 loans, Mr. Bailey believes. Currently, they could get an initial rate of about 8% to 8.5% on a new loan.
But that won't be possible for some borrowers who have taken on lots more credit-card debt and whose homes haven't appreciated as much as expected. Because their debt costs would be so high in relation to their income and because they can't extract cash from their home equity, they may not qualify for refinancing. That means meeting the higher payments on the original loan or facing foreclosure.
"The ones who get stuck are probably going to be the ones who needed to refinance the most," Mr. Bailey says.
Even those who do refinance into a new 2/28 loan won't necessarily be in the clear because they still face an eventual reset, and refinancing typically costs thousands of dollars in fees, which often are rolled into the new loan.
A common sales pitch for 2/28 loans is that the borrower can use those first two years before the reset to improve his or her credit score and then qualify for a cheaper prime loan. "But that goal is rarely realized," says Daniel H. Jacobs, chief executive officer of 1st Metropolitan Mortgage, Charlotte, N.C. As the housing market cools, it probably will get harder for marginal borrowers to refinance on attractive terms, he notes, adding: "At some point, people are going to have to pay the piper."
 
Upvote 0
By JAMES R. HAGERTY
March 11, 2006; Page A1
Millions of Americans who stretched themselves financially to buy homes face a painful adjustment -- some could even lose their houses -- as monthly payments on adjustable-rate mortgages are reset higher.
In the hot housing market of recent years, many households took advantage of "affordability" mortgage loans -- heavily promoted by lenders -- that hold down payments for an initial period. Now the initial periods are coming to an end on many of these loans, leaving borrowers to face resets of their interest rates that can cause monthly payments to shoot up between 10% and 50%.
More than $2 trillion of U.S. mortgage debt, or about a quarter of all mortgage loans outstanding, comes up for interest-rate resets in 2006 and 2007, estimates Moody's Economy.com, a research firm in West Chester, Pa.
Most borrowers will be able to cope with the coming wave of resets, in some cases by refinancing with new loans, lenders and mortgage industry analysts say. But some borrowers will have trouble meeting the higher payments and may be forced to sell their homes or could lose their homes to foreclosures. A recent study by First American Real Estate Solutions, a unit of title insurer First American Corp., projects that about one in eight households with adjustable-rate mortgages that originated in 2004 and 2005 will default on those loans.
Resets will "eat into discretionary spending" for many Americans, says Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist at MFR Inc., an economic consulting firm in New York. He expects consumer spending to slow in the months ahead but says the job market remains strong enough to keep most people out of serious trouble.
Still, a barrage of negative trends is making things tougher for already-strained borrowers. Interest rates are rising, which can increase the size of each mortgage reset and make refinancing more expensive. The housing market is cooling, making it harder to sell homes or build up a cushion of home equity.
Regulators are pressing lenders to tighten their lending standards, which probably will make it more difficult for some people to qualify for refinancing. And some credit-card companies have recently started requiring higher minimum payments. Energy costs are up sharply, too, as are property taxes.


One couple that faces a reset this summer is Ruth and Magdi Fadlalla, who two years ago bought a three-bedroom house for about $294,000 in the New York borough of Queens. Their loan carries an interest rate of 7.46% for the first two years. This summer, at the first reset, the rate will jump to 9.46%, they have been advised, and the rate could rise further in the future unless interest rates generally decline. Already, the Fadlallas have fallen behind on their monthly payments of about $1,950 and have been put on notice that their home could soon be lost to foreclosure.
'This Is Killing Me'
Mrs. Fadlalla, a special-education teacher, says her property taxes have risen sharply and other costs of home ownership proved higher than she expected. "This is killing me," Mrs. Fadlalla says, though she adds that "I'm going to work it out."
She is working with two local nonprofit groups, Neighborhood Housing Services of New York and Jamaica Housing Improvement, to try to avert foreclosure. "They never could afford this loan," says Peggy Morris, executive director of Jamaica Housing Improvement, who blames lenders for failing to take more care in warning borrowers of risks.
The Fadlallas got their loan through a branch of Southern Star Mortgage Corp., East Meadow, N.Y., acting as a broker. Like most mortgages, the loan later was sold to a financial firm that put it into a pool of loans that back mortgage securities owned by a variety of investors. Gary Shusterhoff, president of Southern Star, says the Fadlallas qualified for the loan when they applied.
A unit of Wells Fargo & Co., acting as a trustee for the investors that now own the loan, has initiated legal action to collect overdue payments. A Wells Fargo spokeswoman confirmed the action but had no further comment.
Debt counselors are bracing for many more such cases. "We have just begun to see what I fear is going to be quite a flood" of people seeking help in coping with resets, says Sarah Gerecke, chief executive of Neighborhood Housing Services.
Christopher L. Cagan, director of research and analytics at First American Real Estate Solutions, Santa Ana, Calif., plays down the threat to the economy as a whole from resets. He figures most borrowers who bought their homes or most recently refinanced before 2004 are in good shape. That's because the surge of home prices in most parts of the country lifted the values of their houses well above the amounts due on loans.
The bigger risk is with people who bought homes more recently and haven't yet benefited from lots of price appreciation -- and, in some cases, won't necessarily benefit at all because their local markets are cooling. For a study released in February, Dr. Cagan examined adjustable-rate first mortgage loans made in 2004 and 2005, including refinancings. He figures about 7.7 million of these loans are outstanding, representing $1.888 trillion of debt.
About 1.4 million of those households face a jump of 50% or more in their monthly payments once their initial low-payment periods run out, Dr. Cagan says, and an additional 1.6 million face smaller increases that are still likely to strain their finances.
Assuming that home prices stay around current levels and interest rates don't rise sharply, Dr. Cagan figures about one million households eventually will default and lose their homes to foreclosure. That would cause about $110 billion of losses for lenders, he says.
Lenders and the economy as a whole could easily cope with such losses, Dr. Cagan says, though it would be devastating for some families and painful for some investors who bought securities backed by the riskiest loans. "It won't happen all at once," Dr. Cagan says. "It will be spread out over several years."
Such wild cards as interest rates and home prices could throw off the projection. If interest rates shoot upward and home prices fall, the number of foreclosures could be much higher than Dr. Cagan's scenario foresees. If interest rates decline and home prices surge, the damage would be less.
Assuming economic growth remains healthy, foreclosures are likely to increase only "modestly" from the current pace, says Doug Duncan, chief economist at the Mortgage Bankers Association. He says job losses -- not resets -- are the biggest cause of foreclosures.
Subprime borrowers, those with weak credit records, are most at risk. In the past few years, many subprime borrowers held down their initial costs by using so-called 2/28 loans, whose rates are fixed at a relatively attractive rate for the first two years.
A typical subprime borrower who took out a 2/28 mortgage in 2004 has been paying interest of 7.1% for the first two years, says Grant Bailey, a director at Fitch Ratings in New York. Once that introductory period ends, the interest rate is reset every six months for the remaining 28 years of the loan at a margin over interbank rates, the rates banks charge one another for short-term money.
The 2/28 loans generally limit the size of the first jump in rates to around three percentage points. That would bring the monthly rate to 10.1%. Monthly payments for a borrower with a loan of about $150,000 would rise to about $1,315 from $1,000. Assuming interest rates stay around current levels, the rate would jump again to about 11% within six months to a year, bringing the monthly payment to $1,400, or 40% higher than the initial payment. Borrowers who chose loans that allow them to pay only the interest for an initial period, deferring principal payments, face even bigger increases -- more than 50% in some cases.
Choosing to Refinance
Rather than face those big jumps, many borrowers will refinance into new 2/28 loans, Mr. Bailey believes. Currently, they could get an initial rate of about 8% to 8.5% on a new loan.
But that won't be possible for some borrowers who have taken on lots more credit-card debt and whose homes haven't appreciated as much as expected. Because their debt costs would be so high in relation to their income and because they can't extract cash from their home equity, they may not qualify for refinancing. That means meeting the higher payments on the original loan or facing foreclosure.
"The ones who get stuck are probably going to be the ones who needed to refinance the most," Mr. Bailey says.
Even those who do refinance into a new 2/28 loan won't necessarily be in the clear because they still face an eventual reset, and refinancing typically costs thousands of dollars in fees, which often are rolled into the new loan.
A common sales pitch for 2/28 loans is that the borrower can use those first two years before the reset to improve his or her credit score and then qualify for a cheaper prime loan. "But that goal is rarely realized," says Daniel H. Jacobs, chief executive officer of 1st Metropolitan Mortgage, Charlotte, N.C. As the housing market cools, it probably will get harder for marginal borrowers to refinance on attractive terms, he notes, adding: "At some point, people are going to have to pay the piper."

Uneducated people making uneducated loans, I don't feel sorry for them a bit.
 
Upvote 0
From the Toledo Blade

Foreclosures mar the dream

<CENTER></CENTER>
IN FAR too many cases, citizens are having to give back the very symbol of the American dream: their homes. Ohio's foreclosure rate is the worst in the country, and Michigan isn't far behind. Wayne County, which includes Detroit, recorded the most foreclosures in the nation in January.

<CENTER></CENTER>What's most surprising about the Ohio foreclosures is the extent to which they are happening in rural areas and in small towns. Interestingly enough, those residents often have some of the same financial dilemmas as some of their big city cousins: poor credit, low income, and no down payment.

<CENTER></CENTER>Consequently, they can only qualify for higher interest loans, usually 8 percent or more. Almost unnoticed, lenders who once specialized in making higher-interest loans to the urban poor have expanded to target farm communities and Small Town, America,

<CENTER></CENTER>In Michigan, unemployment is the obvious reason for the increasing foreclosures. The seasonally adjusted jobless rate in Michigan was 6.7 percent, compared to the national rate at 4.9 percent at the end of last year.

<CENTER></CENTER>Since 2004 Michigan has seen the number of homes in foreclosure rise to more than twice the national average, and it could get worse, as the full impact of auto industry layoffs take effect in the coming months.

<CENTER></CENTER>Here in Ohio, between last July and September, 10 percent of the state's high-interest borrowers were in foreclosure - three times the national rate. The largest rate of high-interest rate loans is in Hardin County in northwest Ohio. In 2004 when conventional loans were only 5 percent, almost a third of the mortgages in the rural county were high-interest rate loans.

<CENTER></CENTER>This demonstrates just how much Ohio needs enactment of the Homebuyers' Protection Act. The measure, which has passed the state Senate and is now in the House, would regulate and prohibit deceptive sales practices by mortgage brokers and lenders, and it would make them liable to lawsuits brought by the attorney general or other individuals who believe they have been cheated or misled.

<CENTER></CENTER>To be sure, many who face disclosure got themselves in their predicament. Rural residents traditionally have close ties with their communities and are less likely to move to find other employment. When money stops coming in, many borrow against their homes, sometimes not realizing that they are putting themselves a step closer to foreclosure.

<CENTER></CENTER>While Ohioans need and deserve legal protection from unscrupulous high-interest lenders, the whole country must examine what it means when the very symbol of the American dream is lost, sometimes through no fault of homeowners.
 
Upvote 0
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR vAlign=center><TD class=cityTHIS id=city>Fort Collins, CO +10%</TD><TD class=numTHISg id=num></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
They tried pushing ARMs and 'interest only' loans on us, but no dice. 30yr. fixed all the way. :)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Stupid homeowners paying the piper.


Some homeowners struggle to keep up with adjustable rates


For 45 years, Robert and Lorraine Brown have lived in their ranch-style home in Florissant, Mo. One of their four children was even born there. But for the past eight months, the couple have been locked in a sleep-wrecking race to keep up with their rising mortgage bills. They've switched to cheaper phone service, cut back on groceries and sometimes put off ordering medicine.

When they refinanced their home two years ago to pay off some bills, Robert, now 78, was working as a deliveryman. But his employer went out of business last April. Now he and Lorraine, 72, a retired nurse, are both seeking work. The rate on their mortgage has jumped from 7% to 10.5%.

"We were having a hard time meeting bills at the time we refinanced. It seems once you get behind, you do desperate things to catch up, and you never do," says Lorraine, trying to hold back tears. "At the time of the loan, they tell you, 'Well, it may go up, but it's probably going to go down.' You want it to be so, so you believe it."


They feel alone, but they're not. America's five-year real estate boom was fueled partly by a tempting array of cut-rate mortgages that helped millions of Americans qualify for home or refinance loans. To afford soaring home prices, many turned to adjustable-rate and other, riskier loans with low initial payments. The homeownership rate hit a record 70%.


Now, the real estate market is cooling, interest rates are rising and tens of thousands more Americans are starting to have trouble paying their mortgages. Nearly 25% of mortgages - 10 million - carry adjustable interest rates. And most of them went to people with subpar credit ratings who accepted higher interest rates, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.


"Within the last year, I would say 60% to 70% of calls to our hotlines are issues related to ARM (adjustable-rate mortgage) loans," says Chris Krehmeyer, executive director of Beyond Housing, a non-profit group that offers homeownership support services in St. Louis. "That's significantly higher than in years past, because the ARMs are coming home to roost."

Last week, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates for the 15th time since June 2004 and signaled that at least one more increase is likely. That trend is ominous for borrowers who were seduced by adjustable-rate loans that offered interest-only payment options or teaser rates below 2% or that let the borrower pay less than the interest owed. They will face bigger payment shock once their loans reset to higher rates.


The number of borrowers in trouble will rise this year and peak in 2007 and 2008 as the largest number of mortgages reset to higher rates, according to First American Real Estate Solutions, a real estate data provider.


Already, in West Virginia, Alabama, Michigan, Missouri and Tennessee, about one in five homeowners with a high-interest (subprime) ARM was at least 30 days late at the end of last year, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. After 90 days, the foreclosure clock starts ticking.


Most of those foreclosures are related to job losses in auto and garment factories; higher mortgage payments were often the last straw.


What worries experts such as Christopher Cagan at First American Real Estate Solutions are the adjustable-rate loans made in 2004 and 2005, at the end of the housing boom. These loans were concentrated in the hottest markets, such as California, where about 60% of all loans last year were interest-only or payment-option ARMs. That's the highest such rate in the country.


Of the 7.7 million households who took out ARMs over the past two years to buy or refinance, up to 1 million could lose their homes through foreclosure over the next five years because they won't be able to afford their mortgage payments, and their homes will be worth less than they owe, according to Cagan's research.


The losses to the banking industry, he estimates, will exceed $100 billion. That's less than the damage from the savings-and-loan crisis in the 1990s, which cost the country $150 billion. "It will sting the economy, but it won't break it," he says.


'What can we do?'

In the Atlanta area, credit counselors for The Impact Group say 85% of their calls are now related to ARM or interest-only loans. The calls start "when the statement hits them with the new monthly payment," says Marina Peed, executive director for the non-profit group, which offers homeownership education, counseling and financial services. "They are calling and asking, 'What can we do?' "


The call volume jumped after January, as holiday credit card bills, higher gas bills and rising mortgage payments hit some borrowers at the same time.

When Paul and Sandra Wilson moved from California, where they couldn't afford to buy a home, to Georgia in May 2004, they bought a house with an interest-only loan. But Paul, 52, has had a tough time finding work, and they lost most of their savings in a business venture. They refinanced to an ARM with a lower rate but one that reset every six months and that charges a $20,000 penalty if they refinance within three years.


The loan broker "convinced us that it was in our best interest, and in most likelihood within six months our financial situation would turn around and we were going to look at selling," says Sandra, 53, a former law enforcement officer who is disabled.

In less than a year, their loan payment jumped from $2,275 to more than $2,800. The couple filed for bankruptcy and will lose their home next month. "This was our fourth home," Sandra says. "It's not as if we weren't aware, but we'd never had an adjustable-rate mortgage before."

Banking regulators are concerned about risky loans made to people with precarious finances or those who didn't understand the complex terms and the peril they could face if interest rates rose.

In December, regulators proposed new guidelines for mortgage lenders to crack down on loose lending practices. The rules would require better risk disclosure and a fuller analysis of the borrowers' ability to repay the loan through maturity - and at the highest rates allowed under the loan terms.
Bank trade groups complained that concerns were overblown. "We do not believe it is appropriate or possible for the lender to dictate the best mortgage products for individual consumers," America's Community Bankers responded.

No matter what the final guidelines say, they will be too late to help people such as Susan Cambero. She got into trouble after she took out an equity line of credit on her home in Lilburn, Ga., to pay off her car and other bills. As a single mother with total income of $38,000 a year, including child support, she never would have been able to qualify for the $57,000 line of credit from a conservative lender. That line of credit, when added to the balance on her fixed-rate mortgage, totaled $10,000 more than her home was worth.

The monthly payments for the equity line have more than doubled in four years, to about $400. (She also has a $700-a-month mortgage and hefty credit card bills.) "I can pay it, but I have nothing left over to eat," says Cambero, a contract analyst for a computer company. "I'm going to lose my house."

Some success stories
There are few resources to help homeowners in dire financial straits, but there are some. The Homeownership Preservation Foundation offers free credit counseling and referrals, 24 hours a day, seven days a week (888-995-HOPE, or 888-995-4673). And NeighborWorks America, a national non-profit that supports homeownership and financial literacy, has member groups in every state.

One of its members, Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, has been receiving about five calls a day since January from borrowers who are falling behind on ARMs.

Marilyn Maxwell is one of their success stories. She refinanced her loan in 2002. Maxwell, 58, is a former U.S. postal worker who's living on disability payments from the government. She agreed to an ARM that reset every six months.

She kept up with her payments on her house on the southeast side of Chicago until last April, after her daughter, who was helping Maxwell pay the mortgage, lost her job. Last week, Maxwell refinanced her home with the help of Neighborhood Housing Services. She got a 6.8%, fixed-rate loan, plus grants to help make long-neglected repairs.

"I'm getting a new roof as we speak," she said.

The Browns in Missouri also have had a happy ending. The lender, Saxon Mortgage Services in Texas, declined to discuss the Browns' case with USA TODAY last week. But within 24 hours of a call from a reporter, Saxon agreed to give the couple a fixed-rate loan at 7%.
"I'm so elated," Lorraine said.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Back
Top