That's because Gus Johnson is the man! When you the man you get attention and Gus isn't biased at all when he does games. Jim Nantz can GTFO!
Upvote
0
-
Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
- Thread starter MD Buckeye
- Start date
Wonder if the stenographer will ask him if he's crestfallen, maybe discontented, if not dolorous.
Upvote
0
I would love to see a robot Ted Valentine t-up Coack K then moonwalk to the other end of the court through a cloud of smoke.
Upvote
0
OHSportsFan
Fan of Ohio Sports in Indy
Just be prepared when he's our assistant coach 5 years later.
Upvote
0
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/04/duke-wisconsin-out-of-bounds-call-justise-winslow-ncaa-final
Why even have replay?
Why waste everybody’s time taking two minutes to look a replay, giving analysts, viewers and anyone else with two eyes the chance to see what should been the correct call, only to have officials walk away from the sideline desk to say the exact opposite? Replay in this NCAA tournament seems to have gotten more wrong than right. In this cae, it was a contended out-of-bounds call that had actually gone off the fingertips of Justise Winslow, not a Wisconsin player as had originally been called.
Two minutes, probably dozens of views of multiple angles of replays and three highly-trained officials, deemed good enough to be reffing in the biggest game of the year, disagreed with all three CBS analysts, all of Twitter and every American watching. Even a non-delusional Duke fan had to know this ball was out on Winslow.
But, alas, the three men who needed to know didn’t. Duke retained the ball up 63-58, hit a three pointer on its next posession, went up 66-58 and basically clinched the game with 1:24 remaining. It was an ugly game with a fun back-and-forth pace, but it didn’t deserve to be decided by officials who couldn’t tell what was plainly obvious.
Why even have replay?
Why waste everybody’s time taking two minutes to look a replay, giving analysts, viewers and anyone else with two eyes the chance to see what should been the correct call, only to have officials walk away from the sideline desk to say the exact opposite? Replay in this NCAA tournament seems to have gotten more wrong than right. In this cae, it was a contended out-of-bounds call that had actually gone off the fingertips of Justise Winslow, not a Wisconsin player as had originally been called.
Two minutes, probably dozens of views of multiple angles of replays and three highly-trained officials, deemed good enough to be reffing in the biggest game of the year, disagreed with all three CBS analysts, all of Twitter and every American watching. Even a non-delusional Duke fan had to know this ball was out on Winslow.
But, alas, the three men who needed to know didn’t. Duke retained the ball up 63-58, hit a three pointer on its next posession, went up 66-58 and basically clinched the game with 1:24 remaining. It was an ugly game with a fun back-and-forth pace, but it didn’t deserve to be decided by officials who couldn’t tell what was plainly obvious.
Upvote
0
Well it sure was nice of the refs to completely ruin the title game. What was a nice rally by Duke was dominated instead by horrendously one-sided reffing and laughably Duke dominated charge calls.
Upvote
0
For the same reason they have replay in the NFL. Getting calls right is less important than parsing things beyond common sense and giving the appearance of careful consideration. Also, the extra commercial breaks don't hurt the bottom line.
Upvote
0