• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Disgraced Former Penn State DC Jerry Sandusky (convicted child molester)

The prosecution had to make information about the alleged incidents available to the defense. Eight of the 10 have said that they were abused on the PSU campus (5 within the football facilities).

Victim 4 alleges abuse during the Outback Bowl at the end of the 1998 season, when Sandusky was still the DC at PSU.

Victim 2, the kid that McQueary saw Sandusky with in the shower, remains unidentified.

CBS

Attorney general: Eight alleged Sandusky victims assaulted at PSU

HARRISBURG, Pa. -- Prosecutors claim Jerry Sandusky sexually abused boys ranging in age from 8 to 17, eight of whom were molested on the Penn State campus, according to a document with new details about the case filed Thursday. The Pennsylvania attorney general's office said in the document that crimes involving one of the 10 alleged victims took place in Florida and Texas, while another boy was abused at his own school.
Prosecutors were more specific in the document about the ages of the boys than in earlier reports, but much of the information is similar to details revealed in grand jury presentments issued last year that formed the basis for charges against the former Penn State assistant football coach.
Sandusky, 68, is confined to his home while he awaits trial on 52 criminal counts. He denies the allegations, and his lawyer said he did not think anything in the latest filing would change his defense strategy.
"We are continuing with the preparation of Jerry's defense with the goal of obtaining an acquittal on all the charges filed against him," attorney Joseph Amendola said in an email message Thursday.
The latest court filing states that two of the boys, identified as Victim 2 and Victim 8, remain unidentified to authorities.
The allegations involving Victim 2 are perhaps the most well known in the case. He was described by a grand jury report as a boy, about 10 years old, seen by a graduate assistant inside a football team shower with Sandusky in 2002. Prosecutors say the assistant, Mike McQueary, reported the incident to coach Joe Paterno and two university administrators, but police were never notified.
The apparent failure of Penn State officials to contact police contributed to the ouster of Paterno, school president Graham Spanier and charges against two school officials.
The document said that so-called Victim 4 endured offenses that took place in Florida in December 1998 and January 1999, when Penn State was playing in the Outback Bowl; and in Texas in December 1999, when Sandusky's final game occurred in the Alamo Bowl. The filing does not specify the offenses.
The reference to other states comes less than a week after Penn State disclosed it received a subpoena from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Harrisburg, indicating a federal investigation is under way.
A spokesman for the attorney general's office declined comment.
In most of the allegations in the latest document, which was produced at the request of Sandusky's lawyer, prosecutors said they could not provide specific dates, noting some crimes occurred over many years, and the alleged victims were children at the time.
Prosecutors said offenses happened from 1996 to 2009 and occurred at Sandusky's home, in State College hotels, at Penn State athletic facilities and inside a car.



Cont'd ...
 
Upvote 0
BB73;2118518; said:
The prosecution had to make information about the alleged incidents available to the defense. Eight of the 10 have said that they were abused on the PSU campus (5 within the football facilities).

Victim 4 alleges abuse during the Outback Bowl at the end of the 1998 season, when Sandusky was still the DC at PSU.

Victim 2, the kid that McQueary saw Sandusky with in the shower, remains unidentified.

CBS

Sorry if that has been covered already in this thread, I am too lazy to look for it, but can Florida and Texas bring charges against Uncle Jerry since offenses allegedly happened in their state?
 
Upvote 0
buckiprof;2118522; said:
Sorry if that has been covered already in this thread, I am too lazy to look for it, but can Florida and Texas bring charges against Uncle Jerry since offenses allegedly happened in their state?

I believe Texas was looking into it.

There is also the possibility of prosecution by the Feds under the Mann Act.

Edit:

Found It
 
Upvote 0
SI.com

Sandusky will get grand jury records prior to trial

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) -- Jerry Sandusky will get about 581 pages of secret grand jury testimony before the start of his pending trial on child sexual abuse charges, but not as soon as he had requested, under a judge's order made public on Wednesday. Judge Barry Feudale's three-page order said "the interests of justice" would be served by providing the records earlier than required under state trial rules.
He said the estimate of 581 pages was based on a list of witnesses that state prosecutors have told him may be called to the stand in Sandusky's trial on 52 criminal counts.
The 68-year-old former Penn State assistant football coach remains on home confinement while he awaits trial, currently scheduled to begin in Bellefonte with jury selection on May 14. He has denied the allegations.
Messages seeking comment were not immediately returned Wednesday from his lawyer, Joe Amendola, and the state attorney general's office.
Feudale said the disclosure will occur 10 days before the first witness is sworn in, not the first day of jury selection. State criminal court rules say grand jury transcripts are available only after a witness makes his or her "direct" testimony, right before the start of cross-examination.
Feudale rejected Sandusky's request to get the transcripts by Feb. 28, or to get them 30 days before the start of trial. He also turned down the prosecution's request to keep them secret until a week or less before the trial starts.
The question of how to handle the grand jury transcripts is among a set of issues currently being worked out in advance of trial. Judge John Cleland, who is presiding over the case, has scheduled a Monday hearing regarding the disclosure of other material to the defense.

Cont'd ...
 
Upvote 0
MONTbigBuck;2132129; said:

I know you can read it for yourselves, of course, but...da-yum...

The police file includes the report of State College psychologist Alycia Chambers, who interviewed and provided counseling to the boy.

"My consultants agree that the incidents meet all of our definitions, based on experience and education,
of a likely pedophile's pattern"

a second psychologist, John Seasock, concluded that Sandusky had neither assaulted the boy nor fit the profile of a pedophile.

A lawyer for the then 11-year-old boy said in a statement Saturday that details of the 1998 campus police investigation point to "a conspiracy of silence" surrounding Sandusky's behavior.

(the attorney) also challenged Seasock's objectivity, saying that Seasock apparently had ties to an agency that certified Sandusky as a foster parent.

It's always about who they know and who their friends are (and maybe whether they're pedophiles themselves.)
That, and whether they're drooling imbeciles or not:

Prosecutors say Sandusky lathered up the boy, known as Victim 6 in the state's current criminal case,
bear-hugged him naked from behind, and picked him up and put his head under the shower.

Seasock...interviewed the boy for an hour and wrote in his report...that he did not find any evidence of 'grooming' or 'inappropriate sexual behavior' by Sandusky.

"All the interactions reported by (the boy) can be typically defined as normal between a healthy adult and a young adolescent male," Seasock wrote.

Maybe in your house, Mr. Seasock, maybe in your house.

(Dr. Freud would be proud. As I was typing, the way I heard his name in my head was "Seecock".)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
So, in '98 they had a report from a psychologist telling them that everything reported about Jer's conduct pointed to him being a pedophile, but the PedAggy cops dropped the case anyway. (As if anyone with a functioning brain really needed the advice of a shrink after being told about the shower scene.)

"Normal" huh? Man, I'd hate to see what they call AB-normal in State College...
 
Upvote 0
localyokel;2132639; said:
So, in '98 they had a report from a psychologist telling them that everything reported about Jer's conduct pointed to him being a pedophile, but the PedAggy cops dropped the case anyway. (As if anyone with a functioning brain really needed the advice of a shrink after being told about the shower scene.)

"Normal" huh? Man, I'd hate to see what they call AB-normal in State College...

And JoePa knew NOTHING! NOTHING, I tell you. It was just a mere coincidence that he was quietly "fired" within 12 months. Supposedly, so he could spend MORE time with Second Mile.

Burn it the ground. Salt the earth. Sterilize the survivors.
 
Upvote 0
The sick fucks are trying to excuse the naked lathered up bear hug as non-sexual!

you are the one that is incorrect... Reply
to prove sexual abuse, one needs to prove sexual intent. There was never even an accusation of sexual intent.

If I were in his shoes, I wouldn't have wanted to bring it. I don't Reply
care how tough an attorney you are, nobody likes getting his ass kicked, and the ass kicking would've gone beyond the courtroom if he lost this case. Sandusky was still DC at Penn State, he had the money to get a good attorney, he was widely respected for his work with 2mile. All you've got is an eleven-year-old kid from a troubled background who didn't even understand what Sandusky was up to.

Gricar had no choice but drop it. There simply is no evidence whatsoever of intended sexual contact.

I told you these sick fucks would start rallying around Sandusky and demonizing ("at risk" "troubled") the victims in order to protect sainted JoePed's legacy. This obliviax is a real piece of work. Either he's the sickest Paterno cultist out there (which puts him high in the running for sickest cultist worldwide) or he's a god damned pedarast himself.
 
Upvote 0
"All the interactions reported by (the boy) can be typically defined as normal
between a healthy adult and a young adolescent male," Seasock wrote.

Seasock, however, did not review Chambers' report or prior interviews with the boy
before submitting his own report, the police report indicates, nor did he elicit key
details, including the fact that Sandusky had kissed the boy and told him he loved him.
[defense attorney closing argument] If kissing and lathering up a naked young boy before bear
hugging him from behind while you are naked, all while telling him you love him is wrong....

......then ancient Sparta is wrong!!!!! [/defense attorney closing argument]


 
Upvote 0
Gatorubet;2132650; said:
[defense attorney closing argument] If kissing and lathering up a naked young boy before bear
hugging him from behind while you are naked, all while telling him you love him is wrong....

......then ancient Sparta is wrong!!!!! [/defense attorney closing argument]


So are you saying that this is just a case of Ped Aggy being Sparty?
 
Upvote 0
you are the one that is incorrect... Reply
to prove sexual abuse, one needs to prove sexual intent. There was never even an accusation of sexual intent.

The author of this post has clearly never delved into the concept of BOUNDARIES and why they are necessary in the healthy development of personality. Maybe they don't have any for themselves; maybe they are in the habit of violating those of others. If you actually have to explain to someone why it is inappropriate for an elementary-school-aged child to be stripped naked in a shower, being touched by an adult male who is smearing soap on his body, grabbed body-to-body regardless of whether anything else occurred or not--never mind answering the question of why in hell any "healthy, normal" adult male would find that a desirable activity to pursue--you're just wasting your freakin' breath. It's mind-numbing how obtuse, unenlightened and medieval these damn people are. All the John Bradshaw lectures in the world couldn't help them.

PS Here's another big shout-out to the Lords of Karma: It's Spring now.
I'm still waiting for that series of F5 tornadoes to clean up Slappy Valley. Don't make me ask you again. :mad1:
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top