• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Yahoo, Tattoos, and tOSU (1-year bowl ban, 82 scholly limit for 3 years)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh I am aware there are many ways this could have gone. I'm just saying I'm not sure even if this info was brought to the NCAA in April they would of been able to wrap up and make a ruling before December and due to that I don't think the NCAA will rule that the games or stricken from the record. As when there is doubt it tends to be erred on the side of caution but then again this isn't a court of law and the NCAA can do whatever they want within reason.
 
Upvote 0
I have been a life long fan of the Buckeyes, and with all the situations that have occured over the past couple months I still have tremondous respect for Tressel. I believe he has taken this program above and beyond anyones expectations (especially when it was suppose to be a "rebuilding year"). I fully support him no matter what comes up. I mean I even emailed him and let him know that I respect for how he has handled all these allegations that have occured during his tenure. As true Buckeye fans we must stand by our team and the people who leads them this includes "the tat 5". :oh:
 
Upvote 0
I am sure this has been said because i went out and got drnuk but yahoo made this a million times worse than it was and fuck them for that. Tressel of course did the right thing wtf are you supposed to do when its an attorney who contacts you? Fuck the world Go Bucks I am drunk but its bullshit us reporting this on our own woyld have looked a billion timrs better. Jim Tressel we love you bro
 
Upvote 0
One thing i will say is that its a shame tbat programs like ohio state and coaches like jim tressel get in trouhle when we all know what the fu'ck is going on in the sec and they get off with nothing. Fuck thAt we are the cleNest prgram compared to so many schools in the sec and around the country. Its bullshit im drunk az fuck its fucking bullshit though. GO BUCKS
 
Upvote 0
KingLeon;1886101; said:
Tressel of course did the right thing wtf are you supposed to do when its an attorney who contacts you?

he's supposed to contact OSU's counsel...then the monkey is off his back and the attorney-client priviledge is still intact

foul-up of epic proportions by JT...amazing
 
Upvote 0
DaveyBoy;1886105; said:
he's supposed to contact OSU's counsel...then the monkey is off his back and the attorney-client priviledge is still intact

foul-up of epic proportions by JT...amazing

A mistake or foul-up? Certainly.

Epic proportions? I have to think that if it was truly an epic fuck up Ohio State would be looking for a new head coach at this point in time.

Let's not overblow what is already a bad situation with mindless hyperbole. The epicness or non-epicness won't be fully decided until the NCAA rules in any case.

Beyond that, I'm certain more than one NCAA Head Coach is now going through or will go through his email in the next 24 hours.
 
Upvote 0
DiaBuckeye;1886087; said:
The rule has good intentions, lets say that. But it is not "fine". If you are going to give someone a gift, it is theirs. Period. They can sell it if they damn well please. If it is a problem, players should NOT get gifts. Or we should accept the fact that players are what make their gifts worth anything in the first place. Terrelle Pryor's talents are what make his jersey valuable to a fan.

And I am not behind comparing violations to justify our lesser ones. I was just making a point. We are all proud of our clean reputation. That is why when someone fails to understand that reputation, I tend to... make comparisons.

I see your point in everything you've said, especially the comparisons. I just don't like doing it for the reasons I stated. Each to his own, and I certainly see your side.

As far as the rule goes... I also agree with your general point, but I think if they were allowed to sell the items that there would be too many people taking advantage of it. The rule is there for the good of the game, so that everyone can be as competitive as possible.

The talents in college are what make the items valuable for fans, but recruiting is where the real problem is. A school could easily set up a scheme where they gave an absurd amount of money to a booster to purchase something from the recruit and persuade that recruit. I realize that the issues with Pryor and the others were not while they were being recruited, but if recruits know they'll be able to sell their stuff for absurd amounts of money, no doubt they'll be attracted to go there. Especially if that's a legal transaction in terms of NCAA rules.

But the general point that it's their property, they should be able to do with it what they want? I agree with that 100%, just not for college athletes. Hope that makes sense and clarifies what I was saying.

I'm long-winded. I need to stop it. Or just stop commenting in this thread. :lol:
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeMike80;1886107; said:
A mistake or foul-up? Certainly.

Epic proportions? I have to think that if it was truly an epic [censored] up Ohio State would be looking for a new head coach at this point in time.

Let's not overblow what is already a bad situation with mindless hyperbole. The epicness or non-epicness won't be fully decided until the NCAA rules in any case.

Beyond that, I'm certain more than one NCAA Head Coach is now going through or will go through his email in the next 24 hours.

point of clarification from my post: I used the term "epic" because to me it was so plainly obvious that it should and could have been dealt with so easily by forwarding to legal counsel. JT is a very smart man. He should have known this.

so perhaps epic is the wrong term....basic may be better
 
Upvote 0
DiaBuckeye;1886061; said:
That was what, $300,000 in gifts? This is what, $5,000 total - max? Along with the fact that the stuff they sold was THEIRS.

Yeah, it's a rather different situation there, Tommy Trojan.

As for JT, yeah he made a bad decision, but let's be for real on this, it was nowhere near as bad as a USC or Auburn decision. If I found out my buckeyes were buying recruits or treating our players like celebrity superstars with free gifts here and there, then I would be thoroughly embarrassed. But this? I lose ZERO respect for JT from this. Hell, it's probably what many of you or I would have done in the same situation. Sure, that's why we aren't the HC, but that doesn't mean a HC can always be a master of human emotion and decision making, even if said coach generally is.

etc. etc.

First, thanks for not taking too much offense to my comment. (And thanks to Gatorubet for his comment as well). I'm not here to trash you guys, just giving my perspective on the issue.

I'm definitely not saying this is the same situation as with USC. There are a lot of differences. However, what the rule was about doesn't matter -- it's the fact that the rule was broken. And I think the thing that is going to really hurt is that JT knew about this for so long and covered it up. From an outside perspective, it looks really shady and speaks to a "win at any cost" mentality that you don't normally associate with JT.

So, contrasting with USC is the issue of deceit. USC (allegedly) didn't know about what was going on, and the NCAA couldn't provide any evidence that the USC staff knew about Reggie's benefits, so the NCAA basically just said "well, you should have known" and hit USC with massive sanctions. But to be clear, USC got hammered for the actions of a single player acting outside the school and an ex-con turned wannabe agent, not due to the staff buying players or anything like that. But I digress.

In this situation, if I'm reading it right, you have the head coach who clearly knew about it going on and then proceeded to cover it up, and to be deceitful about it. There's clear evidence of him knowing about it. Sure, Ohio State is self-reporting, but they're self-reporting a long time after discovering the problem. Consider that, iirc, JT also signed a Certificate of Compliance saying he had told the university of any possible violations. Was that a lie?

Then when the news came out about knowing about the players selling their stuff, do we assume JT still didn't tell the university? Or did he tell the university and the university decided not to pass it along? Either one is bad. Of course, that handling led to the very suspicious arrangement to still let TP and the others play in their bowl game.

So consider the NCAA already was lenient in letting the guys play their bowl game and they received a LOT of flak for it at the time. And now they find out that JT/OSU was lying to them about it as well?

It doesn't look good, and I can't imagine the NCAA will be happy about being made to look worse than they already have after an already very rough year for them.

So no, I'm not saying the scenarios are exactly the same. But in my eyes, and I think the eyes of a lot of people, what happened here warrants a lot worse punishment than what Ohio State is trying to skate by with here. Considering how long JT knew about this, I'd expect vacated wins and a longer suspension at least.
 
Upvote 0
This is a post from the hallways of St. Lukes hsopital. I have to do this quickly because the pretty nurses are chasing me to force their evil ways on me and ravage my body.
FWIW I think that tOSU is handling this just as they should. I have to believe Tressel's story because I have faith in him as an honest man. I think he held off because of the investigation. He should have told someone but knowing how people like to talk I think this would have leaked out before Dec. 1st and that might have influenced the Fed's investigation. I'm not condoning his actions last year.
They had no problem opening up last night and acknowledged the facts and owned up to the violation.
That speaks volumes to me and should to the players and recruits.
JT and tOSU manned up and did what was right.
It's a hell of a lot more than USC or Oregon did.
Some may feel that the punishment was too leniant but the NCAA will decide that. They have all the facts or will have and will act accordingly. The biggest plus may well be that ESPN and all the others won't be able to carry on a months long crusade against JT and the University.

:oh::io:
 
Upvote 0
1. Re. in the age of Foia, why didn't Tressel just delete the emails, instead of replying to the incriminating evidence. I have sent emails to Tressel at his osu.edu account and am positive that screener(s) read them and filtered worthy info to JT according to their "interest and urgency".
FWIW my emails probably never got past the interest or urgent level=no reply.:(
This email from an attorney to JT's OSU.edu account, I would suspect also was screened by a secy who alerted JT that it may be of interest and urgent. So it is unlikely that JT could nonreply and delete it from the email received box. BTW, I still have memories of the picture of Nixon's secy trying to explain and demonstrate to investigator's how the Watergate tapes got erased.
2. Rife is a bad man! Tressel's first response to the lawyer's report of involvement of OSU athletes with Rife was no doubt fear/panic that they were somehow involved in the federal investigation of the witness to murder, drug trafficing, or worse. It must have been a relief that the apparel and rings were not part of the evidence in the investigation, i.e. traded for drugs.
3.The lawyer's primary concern for the players seemed to be that Rife had possession of OSU stuff belonging to two SA's and that they were potentially getting ripped off in the trade of their apparel and rings by a criminal -His email does not inform Tressel that they were receiving illegal benefits. Tressel should have connected the dots, had some inclination that they were potentially receiving improper benefits but to suggest as the media is detailing that JT was told that the 2 or 5 SA's "were receiving illegal/improper benefits" is just inaccurate.
4. Tressel's disclosure at the Dec. COI hearing admitted a partial disclosure--his concern with reports of behavior issues and bad decision making, but did not admit that he had heard reports of improper benefits. His violation was not making a Full disclosure of the "potential" for a violation. It was warranted in both April and Dec.
5. Tressel's and OSU's self-imposed punishment is probably appropriate in that it does not appear that he perjured himself to Investigator's especially around the accusation of being "informed of illegal benefits".
I trust our resident esquires will have some rebuttal or dissenting opinions.:biggrin:
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top